Torniamo a parlare del bando per il corso da Preparatore Atletico FIGC uscito da poco, questa volta per commentarne l'impostazione. Purtroppo dobbiamo prendere atto di una situazione che, ancora una volta, continua ad essere gestita senza voler prendere neanche in considerazione i rilievi che la nostra associazione già precedentemente aveva posto (vedi " Lettera AIPAC al Settore Tecnico della FIGC " e il post " laconic reply of the Secretary of the Technical Sector ). What more we find it difficult to understand, although it is clear will of the Technical Sector to be able to decide independently, without wanting to make it accountable to our profession and our association is the logic behind the provision: it would seem obvious that those skills to a profession should at least protect those who are qualified, however, we see that is just the opposite. How can it be registered or contracted to a trainer that federal law ( art. 27 paragraph 1 of the Regulations of the Technical Sector ) can not perform the physical and athletic preparation of players of any age of football clubs in each category, if not already qualified and classified the technical field of the same? It would seem that not only do not want to intervene in irregular situations, but rather the opposite is sought. Moreover, without pointing any way to facilitate the inclusion of those who are already the technical sector that has enabled. To say nothing of equal opportunities: why a graduate in Sports Science that should already have such jobs without work, is not even given the opportunity to obtain a license to gamble then his chances in the "free market"?
We would like to hear your views (signed) on the issue, in the comments section of this post.
Alessandro Ruspantini
AIPAC Lazio
0 comments:
Post a Comment